Story

 - 

BMS Germany criticises G-BA's change of comparators in the assessment of Opdivo+Yervoy

Country : Germany

Keywords :
BERLIN, Dec 19 (APM) - Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) criticised how the highest health technology assessment (HTA) body G-BA changed comparators during the assessment of their immuno-oncology combination Opdivo (nivolumab)+Yervoy (ipilimumab) in advanced melanoma.
In a Friday statement, Han Steutel, managing director of BMS Germany said: "[T]he decision is absolutely incomprehensible for us, I am shocked".
BMS noted that "surprisingly", the G-BA differs from its original choice of the appropriate comparative therapy in the course of the assessment procedure,
When G-BA commissioned the lowest HTA body IQWiG for the assessment of Opdivo+Yervoy, Yervoy was designated by G-BA as the comparative therapy for treatment-naïve patients with a BRAF-V600 wildtype tumour.
In its recommendation, IQWiG saw an indication of considerable added benefit in men, and a suggestion of unquantifiable added benefit in women in this sub-group. In two other sub-groups, IQWiG saw no proof of an added benefit (APMMA 49605).
But the appropriate comparative therapy was modified by the G-BA after the consultation phase, which took place after IQWiG gave its recommendation, BMS said. G-BA chose as comparator a monotherapy with Opdivo or Merck & Co's Keytruda (pembrolizumab).
In its ruling, G-BA said that it was "justified in the specific case to establish nivolumab and pembrolizumab as equally useful comparative therapies" for the sub-group of treatment-naïve patients with a BRAF-V600 wildtype tumour.
But, Opdivo+Yervoy was rated as having no added benefit since Bristol-Myers Squibb had submitted only the results for nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in the dossier and no data comparing the combination to Opdivo or Keytruda.

"Far-reaching consequences" for the industry

According to BMS, this process may put in question the relevance of G-BA's early consultations, made with manufacturers to determine the relevant comparators and data for the assessment.
Steutel said: "We are wondering about the importance of early consultations with the G-BA if the comparative therapy can be changed before the decision is taken and without informing us."
"This may have far-reaching implications for the entire industry," added Steutel who is also chairman of the German association of research-based pharma companies vfa.
/hm/tm

[HM9OIFU5J]

TRY APM Market Access AND GET ACCESS TO THE FULL CONTENT

Interviews with KOLs/senior executives amongst the Regulators, Payers, Health, Medical & Pharmaceutical organisations

Events coverage with a unique focus on Market Access & sustainability of healthcare systems

6 European bureaus : Berlin, Brussels, London, Madrid, Milan & Paris

Ask for a Free trial and get access to the latest stories

Our coverage includes:
  • Health Care
  • Market Access
  • HTA – policies & practices
  • European medicine regulations
  • Drug safety issues
  • Pricing & Reimbursement
  • International medicines agencies

If you are a Payer, Pharmaceutical or Consulting professional our premium data will keep you informed on the regulatory, pricing, market access and cost-effectiveness issues that impact all stakeholders.

REQUEST

an initial 10 day temporary access of APM Market Access.